Shahar Peer vs Na Li Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L L W W L L L
Form
W W L W W L L W W LHead-2-Head: Peer 2 - 2 Li
They have played 10 sets in total, with Peer winning 5 and Li winning 5. The last match between Peer and Li was at the Mutua Madrilena Madrid Open - Madrid, 14-05-2010, Quarterfinals, Clay with Shahar Peer getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Shahar Peer | 2 |
| Na Li | 2 |
| Peer | Stats | Li |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 11 | Highest Rank | 2 |
| 37 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 9 | Titles | 15 |
| 58% (388-277) | Career Total W/L | 70% (402-169) |
| $2,894,734 | Career Prize Money | $12,713,039 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
69%
(
85 of
124)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
47%
(
53 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
59 of
124)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
||||
| 7-5 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Na Li
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 2-6 6-0 6-1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
71%
(
59 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 36 | Games Won | 45 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 15 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 70% (199/286) | 1st Serve % | 69% (226/326) |
| 57% (113/199) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (134/226) |
| 41% (36/87) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (48/100) |
| 28% (13/46) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (17/34) |
| 44% (144/326) | Return Points Win % | 48% (137/286) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Shahar Peer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Viktorija Golubic
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paula Cristina Goncalves
Player
Shahar Peer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
32%
(
8 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
48%
(
29 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Kateryna Volodko
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
52 of
91)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Valeria Gorlats
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
58)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Ipek Soylu
Player
Shahar Peer
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
63 of
88)
1
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
4
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
44 of
88)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
5-7 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kristyna Pliskova
Player
Shahar Peer
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
12
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Shahar Peer
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Veronica Cepede Royg
Player
Shahar Peer
74%
(
62 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
10
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shahar Peer
Player
Marcela Zacarias
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
28 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Na Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Barbora Strycova
Player
Na Li
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
39 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Yvonne Meusburger
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Paula Kania
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Na Li
51%
(
43 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Errani
Player
Na Li
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Samantha Stosur
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Casey Dellacqua
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maria Sharapova
Player
Na Li
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
39%
(
38 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Sloane Stephens
71%
(
66 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
76)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Na Li
Player
Jie Zheng
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
75%
(
30 of
40)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Peer vs Li?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Peer Vs Li is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (388/277) | Win/Loss | 70% (402/169) |
| 56% (855/668) | Sets Win/Loss | 67% (872/434) |
| 52% (7235/6580) | Games Win/Loss | 57% (6813/5132) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 551 | Aces Total | 871 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1575 | Total Double Faults | 1314 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 76.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 47.24 |
| 65% (21212/32646) | 1st Serve % | 67% (19612/29098) |
| 61% (12882/21212) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (12471/19612) |
| 44% (5081/11441) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (4610/9482) |
| 48% (2024/4236) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1849/3779) |
| 46% (15135/32818) | Return Points Win % | 47% (13660/29265) |
| 58% (384/659) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 71% (400/564) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (71/125) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (68/123) |
| 58% (114/195) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (103/173) |
| 87% (370/321) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (387/351) |
| 13% (370/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (387/35) |
| 23% (295/67) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 28% (182/51) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
